On 09/11/15(Mon) 13:11, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em 09-11-2015 12:45, Sly Midnight escreveu: > > [...] > > This was not a big deal as rtadvd would simply see the new prefix on my > > internal interface and start sending out RA's with that prefix. And > > naturally my internal clients would automatically reconfigure themselves. > > > > Now I've noticed for a couple releases or more rtadvd does not notice a > > change of the available prefixes assigned to the interface it both > > monitors and advertises on. I have not changed my config for it, as I > > just run it without a configuration file invoking it's default behavior > > (since I cannot know what my IPv6 prefix will be ahead of time). > > I noticed this same behaviour. I devised two solutions, one is to use > ifstated to monitor link changes and restart rtadvd accordingly and the > other is to use ULA on the internal network.
As soon as you notice a regression please try to notify us. I'm sorry to say so, but we don't have the manpower to dig for a regression that might have happen since "a couple of releases". One of the reason we ask for a dmesg is that we can easily identify when things broke. We try the best we can not to break things, but sometimes it is hard. Sorry for that. Now if you prefer to cook your own workaround, that's up to you ;) Cheers, Martin
