Sent from my (company furnished) iPhone > On May 31, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Kapfhammer, Stefan <sk...@skapf.de> wrote: > > Sorry forgot to mention: > www.oki.com > > Models: OKI ML-380/ML-381/ML-390/ML-391 > Thanks. I was looking at this model using my online thinking box. Glad a human being could confirm for me without an endless list of obvious information and wiki links.
> -stefan > > Gesendet von meinem BlackBerry 10-Smartphone. > Originalnachricht > Von: Kapfhammer, Stefan > Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 10:49 > An: li...@wrant.com; misc@openbsd.org > Cc: ed...@pettijohn-web.com > Betreff: AW: form printer > > Hello Edgar, > > I would recommend OKI dot matrix printers. > They have 9- and 24-dot printers. They are > well supported with lpd. OKI has also every > part on stock in case of repair. > The rippon cartridges are cheap and last > for up to 2 million chars. > > Regards, > -stefan > > Gesendet von meinem BlackBerry 10-Smartphone. > Originalnachricht > Von: li...@wrant.com > Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 10:12 > An: misc@openbsd.org > Cc: ed...@pettijohn-web.com > Betreff: Re: form printer > > > Mon, 30 May 2016 18:23:03 -0500 Edgar Pettijohn <ed...@pettijohn-web.com> >> I am looking for a form printer. (The kind that take the paper with >> the holes on the side.) > > Tractor-feed continuous form paper > [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_stationery] > >> New ones are a little on the pricey side, so if anyone can share >> their experience with a make/model that works with little fuss. > > Dot matrix (impact printer) > [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot_matrix_printing#Contemporary_use] > > The price is higher compared to speculatively inexpensive ink printers, > for recurring consumables (ink) act as subsidy to the acquisition cost. > > Now narrower application (industry) reduced demand, lowered production > numbers and respectively raised production cost per unit of dot matrix > printers compared to seemingly cheaper actually expensive ink printers. > > Ribbon cartridges remain the cheapest consumable, dot matrix printers > still offer lowest printing cost comparable only with laser printers. > >> Preferably with lpd, but I'm not completely opposed to using cupsd. >> Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. > > Important decision is the computer interface, here parallel port. > [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1284] > > Compare parallel (legacy) and USB (contemporary) device bandwidths. > [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_device_bandwidths#Peripheral] > > A list of other printing processes, very interesting. > [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Non-impact_printing] > > Laser printing is the document printing technology today. > [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_printing] > > Some variants exist to make ink printing less of a problem. > [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_ink_system] > > Both laser and ink printers have various artificially introduced > software support problems & were listed here for comparison only. > > You did not include specific details, so the info is just as general. > The synopsis is dot matrix printers are cheap, reliable and just work. > > lpd - line printer spooler daemon > [http://man.openbsd.org/lpd] > > My suggestion would be to look for the consumable availability nearby. > >> Thanks, >> Edgar
