On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 01:11:30PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:51:34AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > > I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly. > > > > I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a > > conclusion. I'd appreciate the opinion of the experienced. > > > > I'm noticing messages with no spf or dkim records reach my gmail inbox. > > At the same time, messages with spf and dkim 'pass' state go to gmail > > spam (among them messages sent to me from people in this list). > > > > So, in general and based on your experience, do you think using dkim > > (that implies daemon, port redirections, etc.) is really worth? > > > > Depends on your volume and who you intend to send to. > > To be honest, setting up both SPF and DKIM takes a couple minutes and it > will probably avoid some delivery issues which will waste much more than > that to fix when they happen.
I installed dkim because I've read on internet is, among other things, what gmail, hotmail, etc. (what most people use) take in care. Not exactly what I observe happens in practice as I explained above (I told you I rescued a message of yours from gmail spam, remember?). > > I can understand why someone would be reluctant to setup dmarc, but dkim > and spf are really a no brainer. You say this because you surely are quite familiarized with all this stuff! :-) Anyway It wasn't my point how difficult is to setting it up (I have it working since months) but if it's worth adding complexity. > > -- > Gilles Chehade > > https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg Thanks for answering me!
