Stuart

Thanks for the reply

At this point it appears a specific LAN client “PS4” is responsible for a
high number of device interrupts.

Hoping to clarify if interrupts In excess of “3000” can cause PPPOE
timeouts.

#############################################################################
#
Lan Streaming cat5 no switch

 procs    memory       page                    disk traps          cpu
 r b w    avm          fre  flt  re  pi  po  fr  sr sd0  int   sys   cs us sy
id
 1 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 6872     7   10  0  9 91
 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 2163     7    9  0  4 96
 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 1921     9   11  0  2 98
 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 1943     6    9  0  3 97
 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 1705     6    9  0  3 97
 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 1849     8   10  0  3 97
 0 0 0  18636 3825560    1   0   0   0   0   0   0 2276     6    9  0  4 96

############################################################################
Wlan Streaming

procs    memory       page                    disk traps          cpu
 r b w    avm     fre        flt  re  pi  po  fr  sr sd0  int   sys   cs us sy
id
 1 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  368     7   10  0  1 99
 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  365     8   10  0  2 98
 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  355    10    9  0  1 99
 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  362     9   10  0  2 98
 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  356     8   10  0  1 99
 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  361    10   10  0  1 99
 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  365     9   10  0  2 98
 0 0 0  18632 3825732    1   0   0   0   0   0   0  383     8   10  0  1 99

#############################################################################
No Lan or Wlan traffic

 procs    memory       page                    disk traps          cpu
 r b w    avm     fre         flt  re  pi  po  fr  sr sd0  int   sys   cs us
sy id
 1 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   24     8   10  0  0 100
 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   23     6    9  0  0 100
 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   28     6    9  0  0 100
 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   24     8   10  0  0 100
 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   22     7    9  0  0 100
 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   25     8   10  0  0 100
 0 0 0  18628 3825736    1   0   0   0   0   0   0   24     6    9  0  0 100

Regards
Patrick

> On Dec 15, 2016, at 5:05 AM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> On 2016-12-15, Patrick Dohman <patrick_doh...@centurylink.net> wrote:
>> Stuart
>>
>> Please see below for more info:
>>
>> Please note the 5.7 dmesg is subsequent to a reboot.
>
> Thanks. I was wondering about a bug with LCP echoes I accidentally
> introduced that made it into 5.9 (fixed for 6.0).
>
> Nothing stands out from what you've sent. Some possibilities:
>
> - connection somewhere between the APU and the ISP really is dropping out
> (are you using the same cable for the different locations you placed the
APU
> in? could a cable be bad? check for errors on the ethernet interface)
>
> - machine too busy to handle traffic - maybe tail -f /var/log/messages in
the
> background while "vmstat -w 10" or something is running (maybe under
"script"),
> look for the timeouts in the output and see what cpu is doing at the time
>
>> pass out quick on egress inet6 proto { tcp, udp } from { (pppoe0:network),
>> (athn0:network), (re2:network) } modulate state
>
> btw using (...) causes an extra address lookup to be done when the rule
> is evaluated (i.e. when a packet doesn't match existing state) - you may
need
> this for pppoe0 but you can save a bit of cpu with
>
>  pass out quick on egress inet6 proto { tcp, udp } from { (pppoe0:network),
>  athn0:network, re2:network } modulate state
>
> (and same for the v4 rule)
>
>> ### --- Optional Runtime Options --- ###
>> set optimization conservative
>
> not likely to be the problem, but you're pretty unlikely to need that.

Reply via email to