Hello, t1...@protonmail.ch (Tinker), 2018.03.02 (Fri) 02:36 (CET): > Err, that became too wordy. This is what I wanted to ask: > > The common sense way to run a machine is to run it minimalistic, if not > else then for sleeping well at night. > > Now running DHCPD, I like it not to touch any other interface than the > dedicated LAN interface - makes general sense, does it not?
That's what happens: $ uname -a OpenBSD aa.bb.cc 6.2 GENERIC.MP#6 amd64 $ dhcpd -d Listening on carp2 (A.B.C.D). Can't listen on carp1 - dhcpd.conf has no subnet declaration for E.F.G.H. Can't listen on carp0 - dhcpd.conf has no subnet declaration for I.J.K.L. Can't listen on em2 - it has no IP address. Can't listen on em1 - dhcpd.conf has no subnet declaration for M.N.O.P. Can't listen on em0 - it has no IP address. On the same machine: (using ntpd(8) as an example other than dhcpd(8)) $ fstat | grep -e ntpd -e dhcpd | grep -e bpf -e internet _dhcp dhcpd 9001 4 clone 1156 crw------- rw bpf0 _dhcp dhcpd 67012 4 clone 1156 crw------- rw bpf0 _dhcp dhcpd 67012 5* internet raw icmp 0x0 _ntp ntpd 7658 6* internet6 dgram udp [::1]:123 _ntp ntpd 7658 7* internet6 dgram udp [fe80::1%lo0]:123 _ntp ntpd 7658 8* internet dgram udp 127.0.0.1:123 _ntp ntpd 7658 9* internet dgram udp M.N.O.P:123 _ntp ntpd 7658 10* internet dgram udp I.J.K.L:123 _ntp ntpd 7658 15* internet dgram udp M.N.O.P:123 _ntp ntpd 7658 16* internet dgram udp A.B.C.D:123 _ntp ntpd 7658 17* internet dgram udp <out> _ntp ntpd 7658 18* internet dgram udp <bound> _ntp ntpd 7658 19* internet dgram udp <conn> _ntp ntpd 7658 20* internet dgram udp <ections> The IPs are three different RFC1918s and one public IPv4. > The only thing that's unique about the LAN interfaces is that among all > interfaces, it's the only one to have the unique value pair of its > netmask (e.g. 255.255.255.0), and its IPv4 IP (e.g. 18.104.22.168) > bitwise-and the netmask (yielding 22.214.171.124). > > Is that dhcpd's selection criteria for what interfaces to touch, i.e. > resolve the IF:s that match netmask and ip-bitwiseand-netmask? >From dhcpd(8): The names of the network interfaces on which dhcpd should listen for broadcasts may be specified on the command line. This should be done on systems where dhcpd is unable to identify non-broadcast interfaces, but should not be required on other systems. If no interface names are specified on the command line, and the -u option is not given, dhcpd will identify all network interfaces which are up, eliminating non-broadcast interfaces if possible, and listen for DHCP broadcasts on each interface. And, because it's referenced: -u[bind_address] Use a UDP socket instead of BPF for receiving and sending packets. Only DHCPINFORM messages can be handled on this socket; other messages are discarded. With this option, dhcpd can answer DHCPINFORM from clients on non Ethernet interfaces such as tun(4) or pppx(4). If bind_address is specified, dhcpd will bind to that address; otherwise the limited broadcast address (255.255.255.255) is used as the default. For more details on the selection criteria you might need to go for the source. Further info from official documentation: innovations.html: * Privilege separation: First implemented by Niels Provos and Markus Friedl in OpenSSH in March 2002, released with OpenBSD 3.2. The concept is now used in many OpenBSD programs, for example bgpd(8), dhclient(8), *dhcpd(8)*, dvmrpd(8), eigrpd(8), faq6.html usage example: # rcctl set dhcpd flags em1 em2 [...] # rcctl set dhcpd flags vether0 faq/pf/example1.html usage example: # rcctl enable dhcpd # rcctl set dhcpd flags em1 athn0 With OpenBSD documentation such examples are rarely just typed away but carefully chosen. 62.html * dhcpd(8)/ dhcrelay(8) improvements: + Take greater care to process all data read, and only data read, from the bpf(4) socket. 61.html * dhclient(8)/ dhcpd(8)/ dhcrelay(8) improvements: + Stop leaking option data received on the udp socket. plus59.html * In dhclient(8), dhcpd(8) and dhcrelay(8), be very careful accepting packets via bpf(4). This is not the end of the grep(1) results. Get www.openbsd.org onto your local disk (available via cvs(1), see cvsintro(7)) and do the grepping yourself ;-) Marcus > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On February 28, 2018 12:48 PM, Tinker <t1...@protonmail.ch> wrote: > > > Hi Marcus, > .. > > On February 27, 2018 3:41 PM, Marcus MERIGHI mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote: > > > > > t1...@protonmail.ch (Tinker), 2018.02.27 (Tue) 07:12 (CET): > > > > > > > Just so I not missed anything in reading the man pages \[1\]: > > > > > > > > If you have a machine with an external and an internal NIC e.g. em0 and > > > > > > > > em1 , and you want to serve DHCP only on em1 , then the only way to do > > > > > > > > that is as a dhcpd argument, e.g. add a line 'dhcpd="em1"' to > > > > > > > > /etc/rc.conf.local or alternatively add a line "dhcpd em1" to > > > > > > > > /etc/rc.local - there is no way to specify in /etc/dhcpd.conf which > > > > > > > > network interfaces dhcpd will bind/serve on, right? > > > > > > > > Has this been for a particular reason (i.e. it's a feature) or just > > > > > > > > noone bothered? > > > > > > > > The usecase I describe above should be typical. > > > > > > dhcpd(8) reads the subnet declarations from dhcpd.conf(5) and get's to > > > > > > the interface from there. It does not listen like other network daemons > > > > > > but uses bpf(4). Try to block it with pf(4)... ;-) > > > > > > Marcus