MB <[email protected]> wrote:
> Invest in a NetApp filer and do it the right way. Plenty of options
> spectrascale glfs/cnfs lustre with DNE/IME why struggle with this hobby OS,
> seriously?
>
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 1:31 AM MB <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Why are you using ooenbsd for anything but a firewall. Even then its
> > lagging way behind unless you deploying in a dentist office. Openbsd sucks
> > at pretty much everything else. Sorry I come from corporate real world
> > experience not Soho stuff. Use Linux.
> >
A couple of points:
(1) Stop top-posting.
(2) NetApp is using BSD nfs code.
(3) I have run OpenBSD in a "corporate world" on a global scale and it
usually outperforms everything else, including Linux, and
definitely is much more stable and secure.
(4) If OpenBSD "sucks" and you are on a mailing list that "sucks", your
life must be truly miserable.
To the original author of this thread -- nfs is a UNIX technology,
originally made for Unix to Unix communication on a network. Windows
client support came later and it is still not stellar. Samba/CIFS is
what is a usual scenario here.
But if you are serious about this and want to attract developers'
attention then please become familiar with sendbug(1).
http://www.openbsd.org/report.html
--Andy
