On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 09:21:46PM +0100, Thuban wrote: > * Gilles Chehade <gil...@poolp.org> le [21-11-2018 21:06:39 +0100]: > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:38:43PM +0100, Thuban wrote: > > > * Edgar Pettijohn <ed...@pettijohn-web.com> le [21-11-2018 11:32:43 > > > -0600]: > > > > > > > > On Nov 21, 2018 8:22 AM, Thuban <thu...@yeuxdelibad.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > I can't figure how to make this "junk" argument to work as > > > > > mentioned in The smtpd.conf manpages : > > > > > > > > > > If the junk argument is provided, the message will be > > > > > moved to the Junk folder if it contains a positive X-Spam > > > > > header. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spams detected by spamassassin have multiple X-Spam-* headers, but > > > > > aren't placed > > > > > into Junk folder. > > > > > > > > > > Any advice ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > ?????? thuban > > > > > > > > > It looks for a header matching: > > > > > > > > X-Spam: Yes > > > > > > > > You may need to configure spamassassin to write it that way. I believe > > > > that the default is different, but I can't check right now. > > > > > > > > > > I tried to add this in spamassassin.conf [0] : > > > > > > add_header spam X-Spam > > > > > > But if you read the link [0] closely, it can't work because spamassassin > > > add > > > headers "X-Spam-someting", never "X-Spam" : > > > > > > All headers begin with X-Spam- (so a header_name Foo will generate a > > > header called X-Spam-Foo) > > > > > > I guess the "junk" keyword in smtpd.conf was written to be handy, so I > > > miss > > > something. Where ? > > > > > > > You didn't miss anything, the maildir agent only supports X-Spam headers > > as of today so this will need a diff to support SpamAssassin if it can't > > generate a X-Spam header. > > > > Okay, thanks, I doubt since english is not my main language. > > > SpamAssassin wasn't a target when I wrote that feature but it's just one > > diff away ;-) > > > > Just need to check "X-Spam-Flag: YES" or "X-Spam-Status: Yes,.*" then. >
indeed, I think X-Spam-Flag is the right candidate. > Just curious, what was the target of that 'junk' feature ? rspamd ? Another ? > rspamd was my target yes -- Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
