On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dereck, > > Thanks for the support. However, my situation is not desparate. > By refusing to answer a question to which he indicated he had an > answer, Ted has left all of us hanging as to whether he *really* > knows what the differences are between the capabilities of pf and bpf.
You're a complete tool. If I said what Ted said then that would be possible. I think everyone here realizes that Ted knows the differences. > *I* could certainly not testify that Ted actually knows the answer to > that question as he claims to. :-) > > (BTW, I had read the bpf man page and, frankly, I couldn't make > any sense out of it on first reading. Did it sound anything like pf? Did you look anywhere other than the man page before posting your question? Greg
