Hey,

long story short: reboot and re-link is not practical.

Long story:
Time to upgrade 6.4 to 6.5.
If re-link been active in 6.4 (don't remember) - I never noticed it.
Installing via NOT RECOMMENDED WAY(following upgrade65.html) - scripting on
steroides (ansible).
All down. Reboot.
and now I get a SLOW sys - why ?! - compiling new kernel:

load averages:  3.25,  1.45,  0.60

53 processes: 1 running, 49 idle, 3 on processor

                     up  0:04
CPU0 states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice, 21.0% sys, 63.7% spin,  0.6% intr,
14.7% idle
CPU1 states:  0.5% user,  0.0% nice, 22.3% sys, 56.2% spin,  0.0% intr,
20.9% idle
CPU2 states:  0.7% user,  0.0% nice, 71.5% sys, 19.6% spin,  0.0% intr,
 8.3% idle
CPU3 states:  0.5% user,  0.0% nice,  6.3% sys, 63.3% spin,  0.0% intr,
29.9% idle
Memory: Real: 382M/792M act/tot Free: 1177M Cache: 310M Swap: 0K/1279M

  PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATE     WAIT      TIME    CPU COMMAND
51958 _snmpd    64    0  956K 3148K run/0     -         3:25 119.87% snmpd
17683 root      64    0  166M  174M onproc/2  -         3:10 99.41% ld
59133 root       2    0 1404K 4248K sleep/0   select    0:08 16.70% sshd
39714 root      18    0  908K  988K sleep/1   pause     0:05 12.55% ksh
69806 _tor       2    0   29M   41M sleep/3   kqread    0:28  8.15% tor
56629 _pflogd    4    0  744K  576K sleep/3   bpf       0:19  7.57% pflogd
92193 _iscsid    2    0  732K 1256K sleep/3   kqread    0:15  4.64% iscsid
  288 _squid     2    0   17M   14M sleep/0   kqread    0:11  4.00% squid
53448 _lldpd     2    0 2656K 3848K sleep/3   kqread    0:07  3.32% lldpd
42939 _syslogd   2    0 1108K 1692K sleep/3   kqread    0:03  1.66% syslogd
 2842 _bgpd     10    0 1172K 1896K onproc/1  -         0:03  1.46% bgpd


I don't think THIS IS OK.
I'm lucky - secondary (but, if ONLY primary??)


For whatever reason, after rebooting, I got back 6.4 kernel.
(I'd like to here some great explanation here and MORE around the <subject>)

P.S.
I remember old times then you could fork and forget.
OS position it self as "an ASCII, no sh around and simple". Then why the
process to upgrade became a nightmare?! Was not like this BEFORE.

Hit me with stright answers and no "bs wrap-around".

Ye, btw, the "ansible way" been working before.

//mxb

Reply via email to