On 8/28/19 5:44 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019-08-26, Daniel Ouellet <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks Stuart, >> >> I guess I had the right oid before, but the fact that is doesn't allow >> the replacement always give me a fail at restart, I assume I wasn't >> using the right oid. >> >> Oh well. >> >> Doing the max speed in mrtg is possible, sure ,but as I have to many >> routers that do change a lot as new customers are added or removed, it >> was a lot simpler to do it in the actual router then trying to always go >> back and over write the final configuration or mrtg each time. > > Can the mrtg config not just be generated by whatever is generating router > configs?
Nope. Way more Cisco routers and time to time changes are done on increase access based on new contracts. If it was simple and possible it would have been done long ago. I am just not sure why the bandwidth command on Cisco allow to use the effective bandwidth oppose to be fix on the interface bandwidth and snmpd doesn't allow to overwrite the same things. The fact that it is possible may not be an RFC fix things in the OID definitions, but it is what it is. When I get some time I will look if I can change the snmpd to may be allow it or not. For now every time this apply I manually changes it. Not the end of the world, just very annoying, but I can deal with it.
