hi everyone http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2017-August/313577.html states that the "urpf-failed" block rule causes the IPv6 traffic (ping) significant packet loss, while IPv4 remains fine is this correct ?
https://lipidity.com/openbsd/router/ states The antispoof rules should be replaced by a strict Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) check: block in log quick from urpf-failed i have both antispoof and urpf-failed, should i leave both in my pf.conf or remove antispoof ? shadrock
