Hi, I've found the diff / suggestion you're talking about. But it seems to be rather hacky. For what reason I guess it never made it into the tree.
I'll ask tech@ what they'd think about a patch. g, Stephan On 2019-10-17 11:02, flauenroth wrote: > There was an effort, if memory serves but never got committed afaik. Not sure > what happened any why but you should be able to dig the mailiing list > conversation up and from there compile the uncommitted patch for your needs. > At least that would be my approach, except it's now part of OpenBSD. > > > Have a nice day, > > Fabian > > > > _______________________________ > Always exit with 42 to return the answer. > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 11:06 PM, List <l...@md5collisions.eu> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering if there is a reason for the lack of keydisk encryption. >> >> And if there is a reason what that would be. Or maybe I'm just missing >> something and there is a way to achieve this. >> >> Please correct me. Thanks for your time. >> >> g Stephan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
