I think theo is about the same as Linus in how foul he can get...

but on the other hand, he at least doesn't wreck his software with
pointless things like redhat's crap, systemd for example, he  seems to
prefer the keep it simple stupid approach from what I have seen. I much
prefer security over complexity.

I'll be honest, i like libre software, but, libre software that is
insecure, aka redhat's bs, openssl, java, etc... is barely better than
proprietary software.

unix philosphy should have been kept in linux.  Because it wasn't,
well... Linux and GNU for that matter are going to take a hit again and
again, till they learn their damn lessons.

Very few linux people have learned this lesson.  Hyperbola is the only
one I know of that realizes linux is a dead end. I would hope you guys
would feel honored by this fact, but oh well.

Either way, I do have respect for you guys. Even if you don't realize it.


On 04/14/2020 06:08 PM, zeurk...@volny.cz wrote:
> theo wrote:
>> What does this have to do with OpenBSD?
> Alright, let's talk about leadership. Do you folks think Linus is a
> better leader than Theo here?
>
> There, OpenBSD angle restored.
>
> (Yes, medoes wish that discussion about lunix et al. be toned down. Even
>  so, mealso wishes that the passive-aggressive behaviour that theo just
>  displayed here would stop.)
>
> Love && cuddles,
>
>         --zeurkous.
>
> P.S.: Be careful what you wish for.
>

Reply via email to