On 2020-04-23, Raf Czlonka <rczlo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would this by any chance be related to the fact that pcre has been
> removed from WANTLIB[0][1] but the package still pulls in libpcre?
>
> $ ldd /usr/local/bin/mc | grep pcre
> 00001b530c236000 00001b530c27c000 rlib 0 1 0
> /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3.0
ldd shows indirect dependencies too, see "objdump -p /usr/local/bin/mc |
grep NEEDED" for the direct dep's.
in this case pcre is pulled in by glib2, an excerpt from a working run with
LD_DEBUG set:
...
linking dep /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.4201.3 as child of
/usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.4200.10
examining: '/usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.4201.3'
loading: libiconv.so.7.0 required by /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.4201.3
loading: libpcre.so.3.0 required by /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.4201.3
flags /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3.0 = 0x0
obj /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3.0 has mc as head
...
if we are to have any hope of figuring out what happened, OP will need
to provide the debug output. the most common cause would be an incomplete
update..
