Allan Streib <astr...@indiana.edu> wrote: > Theo de Raadt <dera...@openbsd.org> writes: > > > OpenBSD has apparently become popular amongst people who can't think > > and connect "real world constraints" and "reality" with "no alternative > > decision was possible". This is very common amongst people who won't > > lift their finger. > > I'm not the one complaining about the 16 partition limit, and I'm not > asking for anything to change. I've only said I think it's something > that is the way it is because of the design decisions made on the basis > of "reality" at the time, and which probably didn't contemplate the day > when everyone would have multi-terabyte hard drives and that people > might want more than 16 partitions. I stand corrected on that > speculation if I'm wrong.
Reality hasn't changed. A sector is still 512 bytes, and disklabel has to fit in it. You are not LISTENING.
