On April 25, 2020 4:09:53 AM GMT+03:00, Theo de Raadt <dera...@openbsd.org> 
>Allan Streib <astr...@indiana.edu> wrote:
>> Theo de Raadt <dera...@openbsd.org> writes:
>> > OpenBSD has apparently become popular amongst people who can't
>> > and connect "real world constraints" and "reality" with "no
>> > decision was possible".   This is very common amongst people who
>> > lift their finger.
>> I'm not the one complaining about the 16 partition limit, and I'm not
>> asking for anything to change. I've only said I think it's something
>> that is the way it is because of the design decisions made on the
>> of "reality" at the time, and which probably didn't contemplate the
>> when everyone would have multi-terabyte hard drives and that people
>> might want more than 16 partitions. I stand corrected on that
>> speculation if I'm wrong.
>Reality hasn't changed.  A sector is still 512 bytes, and
>disklabel has to fit in it.
>You are not LISTENING.

Does  this mean that with a sector of 4096 (modern HDDs/SSDs) and a patch - we 
can have larger disklabel ?

Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov

Reply via email to