Re: email attachments in firefox

[Oriol Demaria]

Well I think if this would be the case maybe chromium should be in the core OS image not in ports or Firefox removed from ports, right? But I don't think is the case. Chromium might have better architecture regarding security, but for many privacy is as important as security or maybe even more if what we are defending from are very hard to exploit vulnerabilities, that would need to target an OS OpenBSD which is not that widespread.

https://github.com/iridium-browser/tracker/wiki/Differences-between-Iridium-and-Chromium

Regards,

---
Oriol Demaria
Systems Administrator
2FFED630C16E4FF8

On 24/08/2020 13:50, Mihai Popescu wrote:

Chromium as far as I know in the past from people that analysed it's traffic was making async calls to google DNS. Not sure if is longer the case, but if it wasn't maybe a project like Iridium wouldn't exist.

But sometimes, the file selection will offer the content of /tmp and you

have no way of making it something else.

Many times when Firefox jumped in discussions, it was said a clear

else, you are on your own <- multiple times said, again and again.

statement: use Chromium. You are safer and supported. You choose something

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature