I use https://undeadly.org/errata/errata.rss
Seems to work for the last 2 years G On 23/05/2023 13:13, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023/05/23 09:35, Xavier wrote: >> I did not say that. I did not see that you in particular, or anyone in this >> mailing list, make this work. >> As a user, I simply suggest creating an RSS channel for security advisories >> and *even* I offer myself to help. >> >> The intention behind was to improve OpenBSD web. Simply. > The number of people who work on errata, for obvious reasons, needs > to be a small set of people that we know+trust. Sometimes (though > fortunately not all that often) that work is very delicate and needs to > be done quickly but carefully. High stress situation already. > > Adding extra steps to the errata process, to merely provide the same > information which is _already provided_ but just not in the format you > prefer (in the case of pages on www.openbsd.org) and not on the website > you prefer (in the case of the rss feed on undeadly.org), can't be of > more than minor benefit to you, and no benefit to most people who > already receive that information via other methods, yet it adds extra > steps (= work) for every erratum that is produced. > >> Perhaps it's me but I perceived some kind or rudeness in some responses. > After being given a workable answer (the rss feed on undeadly), you didn't > like it and asked volunteers to do even more work than they already do, to > mostly benefit you. Which I think some will consider a bit rude itself. > >> Oh! Come on! Why don't we concentrate in teach reasons and not in "I don't >> want to move my position". Do you think this kind of answer would benefit >> the project? > There's no need to concentrate on tech reasons because it's not a technical > problem. >
