Here again,
I took a spare stick, I did a copy of the system and I did the moving thing as suggested. The biggest available partition was 3gb. I move /usr there and I left /usr/local on the original 10gb partition. Tested the system run fine. My concerns are now on the new /usr partition Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on 3.0G 2.6G 270M 91% /usr I think with this disk layout I'm no more able to do a sysupgrade or I'm wrong? /usr must have almost 1.1gb available by memory? Confirmed this I think better to stay with all my /usr on the 10gb partition as per my original layout? --Daniele Bonini Jan Stary <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 13 04:37:25, [email protected] wrote: > > - /usr/local/share/gtk-doc (=131MB), html doc completed of some vary > > .png files.. I guess this could be not only an endemic problem > > of my stick as gtk-doc is not installed here: I'm not in the need > > of GTK C code documentation > > - /usr/local/share/doc (=118MB) > > So you have /usr/local under the /usr filesystem. > Make /usr/local separate. Chances are that's what's > filling your /usr, which by itself is pretty small. > > > - what about /usr/local/share/gir-1.0 (70M) ? > > If you worry about 70MB dirs, you are wasting your time, > and everyone else's. Just reinstall /usr/local on a separate > 10GB partition and be done with it. It costs almost nothing. > > > I'd like almost to delete ./gtk-doc and move ./doc to eg. /home/ > > (with sensibly more space) with a link to among the toppings.. ;D > > Stop wasting time. >
