On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 12:03 PM Michael Hekeler <mich...@hekeler.com> wrote: > > > > To be honest I don't understand the problem you described. > > > > It is simple, when you come from Android (tested Android 11 tablet) with > > file names exceeding the FAT spec > > these are cut to 8.3 format in OpenBSD. > > > You mean android allows to create filenames >255 on FAT32? > Then you should report this non-compliance on android > (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/filesystem-functionality-comparison#limits) >
That table is pretty vague, maybe there's a byte-vs-character bug somewhere in the chain. If "255 Unicode characters" is taken to be 255 codepoints, how are they encoded? Digging around a little more shows that they probably mean "255 UCS-2 words". Wonder if OP is actually seeing more than 255 unique "User-perceived characters" or just more than 255 bytes?
