On Jul 10 14:44:28, [email protected] wrote:
> we have been using mfs mounted /var /dev and /tmp for years
Why?
> however the impact of mfs (/var in particular) on upgrades has been
> quite painful,
How?
> my latest iteration for fstab is to have
> / , /var /usr/local and /tmp with different mount points to support
> different mount options, (wxallowed for /usr/local)
>
> and to
> mfs mount /var/run, /var/logs /dev and /tmp
I assume you mean /var/log (not /var/logs).
> #cat /etc/fstab
>
> ff0023511d131fc2.a / ffs rw,softdep,noatime 1 1
> ff0023511d131fc2.b /usr/local ffs rw,wxallowed,nodev,softdep,noatime 1 2
> ff0023511d131fc2.d /var ffs rw,nodev,nosuid,softdep,noatime 1 2
So you _don't_ have /var on mfs ...
Also, softdep no loger exists.
> swap /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,noexec,nodev,-s=262144,-P=/persist-fs/tmp 0 0
> swap /var/log mfs rw,nosuid,noexec,nodev,-s=524288,-P=/persist-fs/var/log 0 0
> swap /var/run mfs rw,nosuid,noexec,nodev,-s=262144,-P=/persist-fs/var/run 0 0
> swap /dev mfs rw,nosuid,noexec,-P=/persist-fs/dev,-i=2048,-s=32768 0 0
Why do you need /tmp to persist?
Why do you have a separate /dev?
Why don't you have a separate /home?
> ###################################################
> This seems to solve problems with upgrades and package updates,
What problem?
Jan
