On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:36:01AM -0300, Andr?s Delfino wrote:
> It was the unique Unix-like OS with that licence. Right now, there are
> tons of other systems. Companies want to invest in Linux-based
> systems, because of marketing.
what are you smoking dude?
what unique?
there was not att unix and no hpux and no sunos and nothing else?
ibm did not make its own os either?
all those huge moose financed bsd at the same time because
they were interested in using shit from it.
cu
> On 3/24/06, mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:40:59AM -0300, Andr?s Delfino wrote:
> > > Please, stop wanting companies to support you. It doesn't work that
> > > way. To develop an OS under a licence like the ISC has a big hole:
> > > funding. You can't just go: Hey, you use the implementation that I
> > > develop and give away for free, you should pay me!. If the pay you,
> > > OK, if the don't, well, that's OK too, and more realistic.
> > >
> > > One thing you can do, is to maintain OpenBSD free as in freedom, but
> > > not as in free bear. The CVS access would be the same as now, but no
> > > more FTP downloads with ISOs or install sets.
> >
> > sorry dude but you are full of shit.
> > for example from history:
> > how do you think bsd was developped originally at the ucb?
> >
> > cu
> >
> > --
> > paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has
> > remained)
>
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
