On 2026-06-09, ptr <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, thanks for the clarification. > > In my case rdomain IDs are sequentially generated and allocated, so this > would be less of an issue with memory pressure. I believe the 255 limit could > be on the low end if a larger fleet of nodes is factored in and say each > tenant's identical rdomain IDs must potentially exist on every node.
besides memory use, some operations use sequential scans of the various rtables present on the system (i.e. at least one per rdomain), and won't scale well with a larger number.
