OK understand. Is a hypothetical 1023 still considered too large for this?
Jun 9, 2026, 13:08 by [email protected]: > On 2026-06-09, ptr <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OK, thanks for the clarification. >> >> In my case rdomain IDs are sequentially generated and allocated, so this >> would be less of an issue with memory pressure. I believe the 255 limit >> could be on the low end if a larger fleet of nodes is factored in and say >> each tenant's identical rdomain IDs must potentially exist on every node. >> > > besides memory use, some operations use sequential scans of the various > rtables present on the system (i.e. at least one per rdomain), and won't > scale well with a larger number. > >
