---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:54:24 +0200 >From: Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: BGP questions >To: [email protected] > >* Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-07 08:47]: >> > would i need an AS number if this would work? >> >> Yup. That's not all. You need at least a /20 (AFAIK) to be able for large >> backbones to even consider routing your advertisement. But this was heresay >> years ago, I don't know if it still holds. > >no. >more than half the table is /24s and /23s. > >> > (3) the home gateway machine is a PII-350 w/ 64MB ram. is this too slow for >> > doing what i have asked about in (1)? >> Dunno. I suspect you won't be able to load a full BGP table. BGP is really >> a big boys(tm) protocol not sure if 2 ADSL connection classifies you as that. >> If it did then they would quickly run out of the 16 bit ASN space wouldn't >> you think? > >foremost, running bgp requires your upstreams speaking bgp with you. in >general, DSL companies don't do that. >
peter, tony and henning, thx for the info about the scale at which BGP is useful. i now see that the scale i was considering it isn't useful. the motivation for asking this is that i'm running an ecommerce website from work and am interested in having a failover and/or loadbalancing for it in the event that the power goes out at work, etc. colocating the machine that serves it is probably the best idea, but i was trying to be cheap and work with what i already have available (the 2 ADSL connections + old hw). i think CARPing machines when they're in different public IP blocks won't work, i.e. x.y.z.w/29 and a.b.c.d/29 cannot have a single address CARPed across blocks. do tell if i'm wrong on this one since this would work nicely for the situation i've described. cheers, jake >-- >BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/ >OpenBSD-based Webhosting, Mail Services, Managed Servers, ... >Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. >(Dennis Ritchie)
