-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
i dont think thats the point. its important for development in a
team. the head dev can define the structur, andi think oop could be a
very complicated thing. In maths you make darfst too.
On Aug 13, 2006, at 7:26 PM, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 8/13/06, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 10:36:23AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
> UML is retarded.
Not being familiar with UML specifically, I find this amusing.
Years ago
I learned all the "structured" techniques around the time OO was
taking
off. I learned some of the OO modelling, too. I found Entity
Relationship Diagrams (ERDs) and transaction-based analysis quite
useful, even in an OO context.
Have things gotten *worse* since then? Have older, useful
methodologies
fallen by the wayside because they're not new and cool?
See for yourself:
http://www.uml.org/
The new thing, or at least the new thing a year ago when this was
shoved on us, is that now they are going to *generate code from UML*.
For some reason the prospect of a graphical programming language has
got a lot of people hyped up.
"Look! I can do Java without even writing it! Love me!"
-Nick
iD8DBQFE32jE7h0sIchkcqsRAmBlAJ9gMgbP/8W80J+68iHCtdrWbdfT4QCfQZ0r
8FRujfcjwOUy8E8wsNtI7hI=
=qvXa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
