On 2/8/07 4:13 PM, mickey wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:22:21PM +0100, chefren wrote:
On 2/8/07 3:09 PM, mickey wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:02:32PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:06:45PM +0100, mickey said that
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:13:29AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:40:52PM -0500, Nick Holland said that
It means translation is stupid, but we keep doing it. :)
it is not really the translation that got me worried
(although wouldn't it be more consistent to use the n x 255 x 63
version everywhere?) but the different number of sectors..
thanks for the great explanation.
who gives a flying fuck?
bios is using it's own geometry and we are using ours.
how about you ask those spammers to send dick measurements in meters?
perhaps this could go into the faq?
what? dick measurement techniques?
OpenBSD is about pro active security, those techniques should be
integrated into the kernel.
this is a part of my plan right after i finally commit my
optimised xml parser for kernel. it has also asm implemetation
for vax (requires CIS-XML microcode though).
OK, even better!
Just to be sure, I know this is a little paranoid but the users really
need it top notch: You won't forget full ASN.1 support won't you?
+++chefren
