On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 04:27:21PM +0100, chefren wrote:
> On 2/8/07 4:13 PM, mickey wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:22:21PM +0100, chefren wrote:
> >>On 2/8/07 3:09 PM, mickey wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:02:32PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> >>>>hmm, on Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:06:45PM +0100, mickey said that
> >>>>>On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:13:29AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> >>>>>>hmm, on Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:40:52PM -0500, Nick Holland said that
> >>>>>>>It means translation is stupid, but we keep doing it. :)
> >>>>>>it is not really the translation that got me worried
> >>>>>>(although wouldn't it be more consistent to use the n x 255 x 63
> >>>>>>version everywhere?) but the different number of sectors..
> >>>>>>thanks for the great explanation.
> >>>>>who gives a flying fuck?
> >>>>>bios is using it's own geometry and we are using ours.
> >>>>>how about you ask those spammers to send dick measurements in meters?
> >>>>perhaps this could go into the faq?
> >>>what? dick measurement techniques?
> >>OpenBSD is about pro active security, those techniques should be
> >>integrated into the kernel.
> >
> >this is a part of my plan right after i finally commit my
> >optimised xml parser for kernel. it has also asm implemetation
> >for vax (requires CIS-XML microcode though).
>
> OK, even better!
>
> Just to be sure, I know this is a little paranoid but the users really
> need it top notch: You won't forget full ASN.1 support won't you?
of course! it's a part of the original specification for
this project we are doing for a very important customer
that i cannot name openly here.
it is going to change the world, man, as everything that comes from germany!
you'll see.
cu
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
