Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 07:23:43AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote: > > > It's therefore not the responsibility of the programmer to check whether > > > the > > > result of optimization is correct. Therefore it's not the optimizations > > > that > > > are source of bugs, but bugs in GCC. > > > > But if you write a program and the user finds it full of bugs, are they > > going to care that you can say that it's GCC's fault? The burden falls > > When I write a program then I specify the language - say ISO/IEC 9899:1999. If > the compiler is buggy then it doesn't conform to ISO/IEC 9899:1999 - the > compiled program behaviour breaches the ISO/IEC 9899:1999 spec. Then it's the > user's problem that he compiled with a compiler that doesn't meet requirements > I clearly stated.
Can you please try to loudly say: "I think, therefore I am"? //art
