Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Indeed, but it could cause you to get blacklisted by some automated > checkers, which is clearly something you don't want. I know this kind of > checker is not accurate, but some local checkers will do it that way and > you will end up with the problems.
After reading your original message, I looked around the first 20-odd relay checkers and lists of open relays google could find for me (search string: "mail relay test"). Some these sites in turn link to extensive lists of publicly available lists of open relays, but I never found any indication that any of our servers (all spamd protected) were on any of them. I take this as an indication that at least the more commonly used ones do not behave as you suspect. If other, less common ones or or pay to use lists are more trigger happy and as a consequence offer less accurate data than the free ones, that is of course unfortunate. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
