I still don't see how hosts in spamd-white are not sent to spamd.
what if a host is in spamd-white, but not in spamd-exempt..
-Bob
* Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-11 17:21]:
> On 2007/06/08 16:02, Bob Beck wrote:
> > > rdr-anchor "hoststated/smtp" from <spamd-white>
> > > rdr proto tcp from !<spamd-exempt> to $MX port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port
> > > spamd
> >
> > The fact that those two table names are different looks suspiciously
> > wrong to me.....
>
> It took you pointing this out for me to work out exactly how anchors
> with wildcards and host restrictions work, but it does work for me;
>
> rdr-anchor "hoststated/smtp" from <spamd-white>
> - <spamd-white> is handled by hoststated rules in the anchor,
>
> rdr proto tcp from !<spamd-exempt> to $MX port smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port spamd
> - normal hosts hit this reasonably normal spamd rdr,
>
> rdr-anchor "hoststated/*"
> - <spamd-exempt>, holding hosts exempted from greylisting, has fallen
> through from the first two; this and non-smtp services are handled by
> hoststated rules.
>
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
if ((not 0 && not 1) != (! 0 && ! 1)) {
print "Larry and Tom must smoke some really primo stuff...\n";
}
