On 2007/08/20 23:29, John Nietzsche wrote: > i have just setted up a new natted firewall server after some period > of inactivity. I got surprised with the new ftp-proxy utility! > > Now, it writes new pf rules, the prior one did not! I feel like > unconfortable by the current ftp-proxy approach, since i cannot > understand the rationale behind it.
Much lower overhead for data connections; they're handled in-kernel rather than being punted to userland and back.
