Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:



tried to take a bit of a side adventure and get HP-UX going on a PA-RISC machine and it's no walk in the park. for cost, support, compatibility and simplicity reasons i've abandoned the project and decided to use other OSes instead.

How was your adventure?? Can you be more specific?? I know the cost part...obviously it is more cheaper run OpenBSD that HP-UX. But i need more...something really heavy like "I tried to install an OpenLDAP with HP-UX and the system load with 2000 users rise to the sky...but the same number of users with OpenBSD had an incredible performance and never pass from 10% of load"....or whatever...


you CANNOT discount the value of having essentially direct access to the devs on these lists. the karma and assistance you receive as a result of making even small donations is considerable and, in my experience, better than any phone or tech support i've received from companies that support "enterprise" software. for a fraction of the cost of a support contract you can get direct access to the programmers and cut out the nimwits on the phone you have to wade through.


I agree with you...

as jc said, the only situation i can imagine where you'd want to run something "enterprise" is in the case that you need a monolithic server. unless the hardware is wacky, i'd still be inclined to run an opensource OS on it for the support reasons cited above. not very familiar with LDAP configs here but i imagine there is a way to spread load between machines, making the monolithic solution pointless.

thanks for the reminder to investigate LDAP more closely... =)


Thanks to you...


       Alvaro

Reply via email to