On 10/30/07, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Tony Sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-30 11:25]: > > On 10/30/07, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > * Tony Sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-30 02:28]: > > > > bgp rib and fib look out of sync. > > > > Any ideas why it behaves this way ? > > > > > > > > It seems like the networks that only exist in bgp fail to re-route > when > > > I > > > > take > > > > down a core router that is the current bgp-nexthop. > > > > > > lookslike there is a case we miss listening to the routing socket, or > > > there is sth in the message that makes us skip it. > > > can you run "route monitor" on the misbehaving machine while causing > > > the change and send me the output (no need to spam the list with that > > > tho)? > > > > > > > > Will do. > > > > So running a setup where ospfd and bgpd carries the same prefixes should > > work ? > > oh. the same ones. that is a bit iffy right now.
That was the answer I was looking for =) No worries, I will adapt the live design I'm implementing as I want it working well on 4.2. I can either make sure ospfd and bgpd and don't carry the same prefixes, which is possibly in this particulare case, or I can go bgp-only. I'm most likely going bgp-only, hot-potato routing is something I want. If there is any testing I can do to assist please let me know, otherwise I'll just continue to play with it. It is my form of mediation to clear my mind from work. /Tony
