On 10/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31.10-08:40, Theo de Raadt wrote: > [ ... ] > > > Yeah, right. > [ ... ] > > and i would suggest that the severe and prevelant attitude toward the > possibilty of poor patches or under-educated actions is the most > significant barrier to encouraging new/young developers.
Well that's the point of it; or at least, a useful side-effect. Linux can get away with sending fanboi masses at its code because it's fine with fanboi masses poking at all parts of the kernel, no matter how secure it may be. Right?
