Mathieu Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I disagree. > > > > A complex interface implies a lot of code. a lot of code > > leads to unreliablity, either through bugs or detracting valuable > > developer time from more important things > > > > A simple interface (well designed) imples less code, which leads > > to reliability. > > So, you mean a more intuitive software is necessary more complex? Can't > we make a simple but intuitive interface without a lot of code?
Well? Can you? Try. Let us know how it went. > > Users who can no invest the effort learn enough to use a > > simple interface do not deserve a reliable operating system. They > > deserve windows, and they deserve pop up buttong in their browsers > > that they click ok blindly for everything. > > > > -Bob > > Do you apply this reasoning to anything in life or do you reserve this > kind of eugenics only to IT? :) It's reality. //art
