Richard Stallman a icrit : > I have no obligation to answer each and every message that people > post, or address every issue anyone else raises. Some issues don't > seem to need answers. > There is a difference between "I have no obligation to answer each and every message" and "I cannot find a coherent answer to several messages". Why are you encouraging people to use Windows by making gcc and emacs available for that system ?
I know of at least four companies I've worked with/for that *rely* on gcc and that would switch to Linux/BSD if gcc was not available on Windows. You are making it easier for them to keep using a proprietary system, why are you doing this ? Why are you promoting proprietary software ? You don't WANT to answer these questions because you know you have no answer but "We wanted a broader public". You look like a lawyer twisting laws to serve his own purpose, the irony being that in that case you made the "laws" that you are now trying to work-around as they do not serve your purpose well. Please, prove me wrong, answer the questions that have been asked over a dozen times on this list already. Gilles -- SCHNEIER FACT #69: If Bruce Schneier rot-13s a plaintext, it cannot be broken by applying rot-13 again.
