On Jan 4, 2008 1:22 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Otherwise why should he repeatedly say some thin that is not > > proprietary as proprietary even after being informed by tedu and > > others? > > Because for me it is proprietary when I can't run it in a commercial > context.
you clearly don't know what proprietary means. if you don't understand the big words, stop using them. you also totally failed to comprehend the license. what i find even more hysterical is your claim that running a 5 year old rogue clone is needed to get your work done.
