a famous one, let S be the set of all elements that do not belong to S On Jan 8, 2008 3:10 AM, Eliah Kagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just recently, I said: > > On the other hand, well-formed statements can talk about some of their > > properties in certain systems. If worse comes to worse, you can simply > > use a different system to evaluate the statement. This really does > > make sense and there is information conveyed--a parallel would be > > Raymond Smullyan's example of a sign that reads, "This sign was made > > my Cellini." That sign is actually telling you something. > > Typographical correction: Raymond Smullyan's example is of a sign that > says: "This sign was made *by* Cellini." > > -Eliah
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD Eliah Kagan
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD Richard Stallman
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD Tony Abernethy
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD Jona Joachim
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD Gregg Reynolds
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD Floor Terra
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD Gregg Reynolds
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD Otto Moerbeek
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD Eliah Kagan
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD Eliah Kagan
- Re: A sad thread - RMS vs. OpenBSD xavier brinon
- Completeness & consistency, was: A sad thread Ingo Schwarze
- Re: Completeness & consistency, was: A s... Predrag Punosevac
- Re: Completeness & consistency, was: A s... Eliah Kagan
- Re: Completeness & consistency, was:... Duncan Patton a Campbell
- Re: Completeness & consistency, was:... Predrag Punosevac
- Re: Completeness & consistency, was: A s... Reid Nichol
- Re: Completeness & consistency, was:... Eliah Kagan
- Re: Completeness & consistency, was:... Reid Nichol
- Re: Completeness & consistency, was:... Tony Abernethy
- Re: Completeness & consistency, was: A s... Predrag Punosevac