* David Higgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-13 04:40]:
> On Feb 12, 2008 9:44 PM, Darren Spiteri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 13, 2008 11:47 AM, NetOne - Doichin Dokov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Could we have a look at those numbers, in fact?
> > From the parent:
> > "In the next step I increased the value for net.inet.tcp.recvspace and
> > net.inet.tcp.sendspace to 262144 and that had big impact on the network
> > throughput.
> > The network throughput increased from 550Mbit/s to 940Mbit/s."
> Unless I'm massively wrong about what net.inet.tcp.* is used for, this
> indicates that the parent was NOT testing throughput as one would
> typically define it for a router/firewall.  He was testing his box's
> ability to send and receive TCP packets.  I think these knobs are
> COMPLETELY unused by the code that inspects packets and decides which
> interface to send them out.

false.

but he chose to redefine throughput, to make communications hard.

Oh, btw, I chose to redefine "false". It means what you call "correct" 
now.

-- 
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam

Reply via email to