Thanks :) I'll try and readup on the misc a bit more as well, maybe I can provide some assistance somewhere in return :)
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Otto Moerbeek Sent: vrijdag 14 maart 2008 9:09 To: Erwin van Maanen Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: dhcpd rc bug? On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Erwin van Maanen wrote: > Oeps :p > > Indeed I had (in rc.conf and I have a .local too), forgot all about > that I decided to use the .local since it made updating easier... > Thanks for the rtfm hint :) > > Just I more question if you don't mind answering it... which procress > starts the rc and rc.local, is that the kernel itself or some kind of > process that is started by the kernel. > No need for a full explenation ofcourse, just another rtfm hint would > be great tho :) See init(8). -Otto > > Erwin > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Otto Moerbeek > Sent: vrijdag 14 maart 2008 8:29 > To: Erwin van Maanen > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: dhcpd rc bug? > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 08:15:51AM +0100, Erwin van Maanen wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I found out i couldn't disable my dhcp daemon yesterday and i think > > i've traced the problem to this in /etc/rc: > > > > if [ X"${dhcpd_flags}" != X"NO" -a -f /etc/dhcpd.conf ]; then > > > > Now i have no clue what " -a -f " does (anyone care to point me to > > the right manual?), but just setting dhcpd_flags=NO in rc.conf > > didn't disable > it. > > I had to rename the file dhcpd.conf file, so i guess the line does > > an OR comparison instead of an AND comparison, anyone care to > > enlighten me or did i actually find a minor bug? > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Erwin van Maanen > > ACMEWeb I.S. > > That expression is right (see test(1)). > > Where did you set dhcpd_flags to NO? In /etc/rc.conf? Do you perhaps > have another definition in /etc/rc.conf.local or something like that? > > -Otto
