On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 05:18:51PM -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
| Sorry, I should have been more clear in my statement. What I was
| saying is that if the original author of the work published it
| anonymously, he would not be able to sue because he would not be able
| to prove he was the original author and copyright holder of the work.
Well .. why not ? He can later say : "I was this anonymous guy, here
is $PROOF, you are in violation of my license, now pay me $$$".
Cheers,
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
--
>++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+
+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/
