On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 04:09:37PM -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
| My guess would be that the content is released into the public domain
| since you can't sue because there is no proof that you are the
| copyright holder.
| Comrade RIngo Kamens

Let me just steal some code somewhere, relicense it and release it as
'anonymous'. *poof* .. it's public domain because you can't sue ?

That's a bit too easy...

Cheers,

Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

-- 
>++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+
+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
                 http://www.weirdnet.nl/                 

Reply via email to