On 17.07-10:26, Jason Dixon wrote:
[ ... ]
> I don't have any customers that use Java for client-side image
> rendering, so I can't speak as to how it would compare. I suspect that
> Java wouldn't be as efficient as flash for passing instructions to the
> client, but that's just a hunch.
performance of "image rendering" ? ? ?
"passing instructions" ???
that's as meaningful as the banana flavoured lube.
;-)
java is a language, flash is a solution.
many would like to see an open alternative to flash but since flash
is "not microsoft" i think it's below most radars. it's also, as many
here have noted, 99.9% meaningless junk; and i'm 100% confident that
any flash application could be re-implemented in Java, should needs,
must.
personally, i avoid flash as a retard filter; remove it and lots of
sh1t suddenly disappears.
p.s: java's "image rendering" is perfectly performant (assuming you
accept java as an overhead in the first place ... of course, flashplayer
is just as bad)
