On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok. So considering the speed with which this patch appeared I'm going > to assume there's more here than meets the eye. Just the same it looked > like a sampling (when/where) issue to me. >
Take note of the OP's name, then read the "patch". The patch was pure sarcasm. Theo's point (if I'm not mistaken) is that the code is operating as intended.
