i can also only recommend to stick with the one in base. i never used
apache2, i was always very happy with apache1.3. there is nothing wrong
with it.
Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote:
--- On Sat, 11/8/08, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Apache 1.3 in base or 2.2.8 from ports ?
To: "Francisco Valladolid Hdez." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008, 8:17 AM
* Francisco Valladolid Hdez. wrote:
Hi folks.
I need a recomendation for using one or other web
server for a shared web hosting for a small company.
Always prefer using Apache from base, whenever I watch
that Apache 2 include best performance compared to 1.3
(included in base), and best reverse proxy for dynamic web
sites.
Which must be the best choice for web hosting company
having web 2.0, mod_perl and rails app's ?
Keep in mind that the Webserver in base has seen a lot of
security and other
improvements like chroot() by default etc. It is not a
stock 1.3 Apache,
it is only based on Apache 1.3.
Thanks for this suggest!
Apache 2 in ports was only imported to make it possible to
test certain
thinks.
Ok
If you care for security, go with the one in base. Huge
and highly loaded
websites are served with it.
I think use the minor posible programs from third party (aka ports), and only
the necessary, most from base.
Regards.
---
-----------------------------------
ficovh - http://bsdguy.net
In the beginning God created the heavens and the
earth. Gen. 1:1
--
Marc Balmer, Micro Systems, Wiesendamm 2a, Postfach,
CH-4019 Basel, Switzerland
http://www.msys.ch/ http://www.vnode.ch/ "In God
we trust, in C we code."
!DSPAM:4915dfad44821047113984!
