* Michiel van Baak ([email protected]) wrote: > On 09:06, Wed 22 Apr 09, Janne Johansson wrote: > > Lars Nooden wrote: > >> Alexander Hall wrote: > >>> Lars Nooden wrote: > >>>> Sometimes I have to set up a LAN inside a pre-existing NAT'd LAN and > >>>> traffic from the inner LAN (B) does not make it to the Internet or even > >>>> to final, external interface (4). > > > >> I've searched around a bit and see there is something wrong (in general) > >> with "double NAT" > > > > I dont know where you got that info from, but as long as each NAT is set > > up correctly, there isnt any difference in being NATed once or five > > times. > > I have seen trouble with 'double nat' too many times in the voip world > to even bother with it anymore.
..and for some protocols you need ALGs in every NAT. /jkm > > Ok, most of the times one of the nat devices was a DSL modem, and their > implementation is,..... interesting. > > > > > In -> Out is the same, and as long as you set each NAT up right with the > > fordards, Out -> In will be as good/bad as one NAT. > > > > -- > > Michiel van Baak > [email protected] > http://michiel.vanbaak.eu > GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x71C946BD > > "Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are both called users?"
