Michiel van Baak wrote:
I've searched around a bit and see there is something wrong (in general)
with "double NAT"
I dont know where you got that info from, but as long as each NAT is set
up correctly, there isnt any difference in being NATed once or five
times.
I have seen trouble with 'double nat' too many times in the voip world
to even bother with it anymore.
Ok, most of the times one of the nat devices was a DSL modem, and their
implementation is,..... interesting.
I might be dense, but you agree double NAT is bad as a concept, since
often one of the devices are broken?
That seems to be a weird assumption. Not that I like NAT anymore than
anyone else, but broken is broken regardless.
