I wouldn't miss it... On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 08:49:15AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote: > > if it's use is far from recommended, indeed rather forbidden, > > why is it left to rot? > > It is left there for historical reasons, because some old applications > may use it. > > For new applications we do not use it, but prefer to use a properly > designed sysctl or ioctl > interface to retrieve information from the kernel.
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Paige Thompson
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Jim Willis
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Daniel Bolgheroni
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Philip Guenther
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Sergio Andrés Gómez del Real
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Sergio Andrés Gómez del Real
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Ted Unangst
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Joachim Schipper
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD frantisek holop
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Bob Beck
- Re: procfs in Ope... Marco Peereboom
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Matthew Szudzik
- Re: procfs in Ope... frantisek holop
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Mauro Rezzonico
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Theo de Raadt
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD frantisek holop
- Re: procfs in OpenBSD Theo de Raadt

