hmm, on Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 03:01:18PM +0000, Matthew Szudzik said that > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:34:20PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > > to remove unused bit rotting stuff. what's the deal with procfs? > > > > if it's use is far from recommended, indeed rather forbidden, > > why is it left to rot? > > It's necessary for compat_linux. See the man page.
certainly not all of it. i am using compat_linux without it. but yes, i can imagine it might be used there. -f -- down with TLAs! (three letter acronyms)
